Unfair argumentation methods VIII: US example
Finally, we arrive at the US example:
An incautious Harvard student made the following statement in an email:
I absolutely do not rule out the possibility that African Americans are, on average, genetically predisposed to be less intelligent.
This appears to have caused a flood of unjustified criticism (cf. the given link), including one completely intellectually dishonest blogger, who made claims like:
[…]my head shook and my eyes rolled as I read the ignorant comments of someone who clearly wasted their money on an attempt to become educated.
[…] she wanted them to understand that she was not wavering and adamantly [sic!] believed that “African Americans are, on average, genetically predisposed to be less intelligent.”
The blog entry, if anything, proves the opposite, namely that its author is the one to have wasted her money…
I have made several comments on that entry, and ethicsalarms has also subsequently dealt with it, so I will not go into a deeper analysis here—in particular, since the “intermezzos” and the unexpected length of at least one planned entry has caused great delays in this article series. Instead, I have directed my efforts on the following entry on “Ships to Gaza”.