Unfair argumentation methods VII: Follow-up, rape charges against Assange
Not quite two months ago, I had an entry on a gender-feminist, Anna Ardin. As I gather from several blog entries by others (examplee) today, Anna is one of the two women who raised (presumably false) rape charges against Julian Assange, the Wikileaks founder.
The topic of Anna Ardin has brought a sudden surge in hits. Following a few links, I found a better English treatmente, which I recommend above the original half-English/half-Swedish example. The lengthy discussion provides much information on various aspects, but I warn that some of it is speculative or based on Google translations. (There are a number of Swedish participants, however.)
On the balance, it can now be stated with near certainty that Anna Ardin is the culprit; further, that this is not the first time she has been involved in a similar scenario.
A few weeks later (2010-09-13), I made a search to receive updates. Among other things, I found a long and detailed discussion in Englishe, which is better than the above two sources (the first of which even appears to have first been deleted and then replaced with a very different version).
of
Michael Eriksson's Blog 
[…] In the wake of suspicions against this woman for being one of the accusers of Julian Assange, the blog has been made private. Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)Unfair argumentation methods IIIa: Follow-up to preceding postReply to another postDifference b/w Them & UsWhy Do We Still Focus on Gender Rather Than on Qualifications in Politics? […]
Unfair argumentation methods VII: Swedish example « Michael Eriksson's Blog
August 24, 2010 at 9:06 am
[…] (Assange stands accused of having raped/assaulted/molested/whatnot two women, one of which, Anna Ardin, was a topic on my blog even before the Assange affair. The other is referred to by “SW” below. Some links to more information are present here.) […]
Assange rape case « Michael Eriksson's Blog
February 7, 2011 at 10:20 am